نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جریان‌های کلامی معاصر ،مدرسه حکمت، مدرسه عالی امام خمینی، جامعه المصطفی العالمیه، قم، ایران
2 گروه فقه و حقوق، پژوهشگاه زن و خانواده، واحد قم، ایران.
3 گروه فلسفه و کلام مرکز مطالعات و پاسخگویی به شبهات حوزه علمیه قم.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Given the growing significance of women's issues following the Constitutional Revolution, the present study seeks to identify, through a typological analysis of the arguments advanced by Shiite religious groups during this period concerning the prohibition of women's social presence and employment, the underlying foundations and the political, religious, and social factors that informed these arguments. To this end, books and articles authored by scholars, preachers, religiously committed individuals, as well as certain intellectuals, alongside the prevailing political and social conditions of the period that bore upon the topics under discussion, were examined using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings of the research indicate that some arguments represented a reaction to the anti-religious inclinations of the ruling establishment, and due to the nature of governmental policies, such arguments gained particular prominence. Another category of arguments was grounded in extra-religious (non-religious) foundations, resting upon modern intellectual currents. In this period—unlike previous eras—strictly religious foundations were not the sole reference point; rather, a distinct type of reasoning, rooted in the prevailing popular notions (accepted customs) of the contemporary intellectual system—including a naturalistic interpretation—was also employed. A further category of arguments was based on religious foundations. In this context, reference was made to the opening of verse 33 of Sūrat al-Aḥzāb, as well as certain prophetic traditions (ḥadīths) that recommend women's remaining within the domestic sphere.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)